Apalutamide Plus ADT for mCSPC Maintains Health-Related Quality of Life

Fatal Prostate Cancer Linked to Balding
Fatal Prostate Cancer Linked to Balding
In the TITAN trial, health-related quality of life did not worsen with the addition of apalutamide to ADT versus placebo for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Apalutamide used as adjunctive therapy to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves survival and maintains health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), according to a new analysis.

In previously published findings from the phase 3 TITAN randomized trial, adding apalutamide, a non-steroidal androgen receptor inhibitor, to ADT significantly improved overall survival by 33% and radiographic progression or death by 52% compared with placebo plus ADT in 1052 men with mCSPC. Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was also prolonged by a significant 61% with apalutamide.

In a new online report published in The Lancet Oncology, Neeraj Agarwal, MD, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, and colleagues presented patient-reported outcomes from TITAN. Participants completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and EuroQoL 5D questionnaire 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months, and other specified time points.

The men were mostly asymptomatic at baseline, with low reported levels of pain and fatigue. Median pain scores on a scale of 0 to 10 on the BPI-SF were 1.14 for apalutamide vs 1.00 for placebo recipients. Median fatigue scores on the BFI were 1.29 vs 1.43, respectively. These symptoms remained stable or improved over nearly 2 years of the study. Median time to worst pain intensity progression was 19.09 vs 11.99 months, respectively, favoring apalutamide by 11%. Median time to pain interference progression was not reached in either group. The 25th percentiles for time to pain interference progression were longer with apalutamide: 9.17 vs 6.24 months, respectively.

In addition, HRQoL was preserved in both groups according to FACT-P total scores and EQ-5D-5L data. Median time to deterioration was 8.87 vs 9.23 months, respectively, a nonsignificant difference.

“The improvements in survival and maintenance of HRQOL shown in the TITAN study indicated that treatment with apalutamide plus ADT should be considered a new option for standard of care for a broad range of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer,” Dr Agarwal’s team wrote.

Suzanne Chambers, PhD, of the University of Technology Sydney in Australia, and colleagues concurred in an accompanying editorial, but noted that additional QoL data are still needed.

“These results suggest that apalutamide is well tolerated in these patients, and therefore it seems to be a favourable option for patients from the points of view of both survival and quality of life. However, as noted by Agarwal and colleagues, other relevant patient outcomes, such as mood disturbance, insomnia, and cognitive deficits, were not assessed, meaning that the evaluation of quality of life was not extensive.”

The TITAN studies were funded by Janssen Research & Development, the makers of apalutamide (Erleada®).

Related Articles

References

Agarwal N, McQuarrie K, Bjartell A, et al. Health-related quality of life after apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (TITAN): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study [published online September 27, 2019]. Lancet Oncol. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30620-5

Chambers SK, Frydenberg M, Dunn J. Quality of life considerations in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer [published online September 27, 2019]. Lancet Oncol. doi:1016/S1470-2045(19)30628-X

Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 381:13-24. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1903307

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1903307

This article originally appeared on Renal and Urology News